in Agile by
Q:
What are the difference between Should-have and could-have nitiatives

1 Answer

0 votes
by

Should-have initiatives

Should-have initiatives are just a step below must-haves. They are important to the product, project, or release, but they are not vital. If left out, the product or project still functions. However, if they are included, they add significant value.

“Should-have” initiatives are different from “must-have” initiatives in that they can be slated for a future release without impacting the current one. For example performance improvements, minor bug fixes, or new functionality, may be “should-have” initiatives. Without them, the product still works.

Could-have initiatives

Another way of describing “could-have” initiatives is nice-to-haves. “Could-have” initiatives are not necessary to the core function of the product. Compared with “should-have” initiatives, they have much smaller impact on the outcome if they are left out.

So, initiatives that are placed in the “could-have” category are often the first to be deprioritized if a project in the “should-have” or “must-have” category ends up larger than expected.

Click here to read more about Agile
Click here to read more about Insurance

Related questions

0 votes
asked Dec 5, 2020 in Agile by SakshiSharma
0 votes
asked Feb 14, 2020 in Agile by matthenary
+1 vote
asked Feb 8, 2020 in Agile by rahuljain1
0 votes
asked Nov 22, 2019 in Agile by rajeshsharma
0 votes
asked Jan 3 in Cloud Computing by SakshiSharma
...